A LEADING Government minister has insisted it did not prioritise evacuating dogs over people in the chaos as Afghanistan fell after a whistleblower claimed limited airlift capacity was used to transport animals.
Former Foreign Office official Raphael Marshall told MPs that soldiers were put at risk to facilitate the evacuation of animals from the Nowzad shelter following a request from Prime Minister Boris Johnson.
Former Royal Marine Paul “Pen” Farthing, from Dovercourt, ran the Nowzad animal charity’s shelter and launched a high-profile campaign to get his staff and animals out, using a plane funded through donations.
Mr Farthing said “not one single British soldier” was used to get him or Nowzad’s animals out of Afghanistan, and accused Mr Marshall of lying.
Deputy Prime Minister Dominic Raab, who was foreign secretary at the time of Afghanistan’s chaotic fall to the Taliban, insisted it was inaccurate to say the evacuation of animals was prioritised over people.
He told Sky News: “We did not put the welfare of animals above individuals.”
Read more:
- Pen Farthing: 'It's time for a pint in a pub now my staff are safe'
- Former Marine says his mission is 'only halfway there' as animals arrive in UK
In his evidence to the Foreign Affairs Committee, Mr Marshall said there was “an instruction from the Prime Minister to use considerable capacity to transport Nowzad’s animals”.
Mr Marshall, who worked on the Foreign Office’s crisis response team during the evacuation from Kabul, said there were “no justification for concluding that Nowzad’s staff were at significant risk” from the Taliban.
In a sign of the limited ability to get people out of the country, Mr Marshall said “thousands of Afghan friends of the UK at risk of murder” were removed from the evacuation lists.
He said: “On Wednesday August 25, many people referred by Secretaries of State were rejected due to limited capacity. This capacity was subsequently used to transport animals.
“There was a direct trade-off between transporting Nowzad’s animals and evacuating British nationals and Afghans evacuees, including Afghans who had served with British soldiers.
“This is because soldiers tasked with escorting the dogs through the crowd and into the airport would by definition have otherwise been deployed to support the evacuation of British nationals or Afghans prioritised for evacuation.”
He added: “I believe that British soldiers were put at risk in order to bring Nowzad’s animals into the airport.”
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here