WHEN National Highways completed their £44million resurfacing project of the A12 earlier this month, a spokesman for said drivers will enjoy a “a smoother and quieter journey”.
The problem is, after two years of roadworks, closures, and speed restrictions, few people can actually remember what the journey was actually like before.
In fact, joining the A12 from the Cymbeline Way roundabout without being greeted by a sea of brake lights and traffic cones as drivers nervously squeeze into two lanes, still feels a bit bizarre.
But rather than being relieved about the roadworks finishing, many are completely disillusioned by a project which came in a year late and £11million overbudget.
And although many may wish to put the two years of roadworks behind them, the local press has a responsibility to ask what is being done to ensure projects of this cost and scale do not run overtime or overbudget again.
Those questions are even more relevant given a huge £1.3billion project to widen the A12 could begin in the next five years.
The Gazette has tried in vain to speak to the project manager in charge of the Marks Tey to Stanway resurfacing scheme, only to be told repeatedly nobody was available.
This all seems rather odd given National Highways seemed perfectly happy to put forward a project manager in August when the Margaretting resurfacing was finished.
One can only presume the organisation didn’t want to subject one of its bosses to face a series of challenging and much-needed questions about the project.
Why was it over budget? Why was it late? Why did road closures overrun as often as they did? And what exactly is 'faulty tarmac'?
These are questions National Highways seem determined not to answer, with their press team instead preferring to release its usual statement about the weather being a bit damp.
Contractors John Sisk and Son weren’t keen to issue a statement either.
But whether they like it or not, the high-ups of any organisation are responsible for facing up to shortcomings and answering uncomfortable questions.
Their decision to look away and order their press team to trot out a bland statement with its series of platitudes says more about the failings of the project than they realise.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here